22You Can Make Me Come But We Cant Have Sex22 Lets Talk

“You Can Make Me Come, But We Can’t Have Sex” – Let’s Talk

📖 11 mins read
"You Can Make Me Come, But We Can't Have Sex" - Let's Talk About Sexual Boundary Gymnastics

"You Can Make Me Come, But We Can't Have Sex"

Let's talk about sexual boundary gymnastics


Reader Question:

"I decided that I want to wait until marriage to have sex, but I'm still a chronic masturbator and ok with doing stuff with guys that doesn't involve penis-in-vagina sex. I guess I just don't really trust anyone enough to go 'all the way' with them. Do you think I'm a hypocrite?"

Okay, honey. Deep breath. Let me get my laptop, pour myself a cosmopolitan, and we're going to have a very honest conversation about what you're doing here.

Short answer? Yeah, you're being a bit hypocritical. But let's talk about why that matters and what's really going on.

The Bill Clinton Defense

You know what this reminds me of? Bill Clinton standing in front of America declaring "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."

Sir. Sir. We all know what happened in that office. You're not fooling anyone with your technical definitions.

That's what we're dealing with here. You're playing Sexual Loophole Lawyer, arguing that everything up to penetration doesn't count as "real sex." You'll let someone bring you to orgasm, you'll return the favor, you'll explore every intimate act known to humankind... but the moment it comes to actual intercourse? Suddenly you're clutching your pearls and invoking the chastity defense.

It's like standing 101 meters away from someone you have a restraining order against and claiming you're "totally following the rules." Technically correct? Sure. Honoring the spirit of the boundary? Absolutely not.

Let's Get Real About What You're Actually Doing

Here's the thing about oral sex, manual stimulation, and mutual masturbation: it's all sex.

It's all intimacy. It's all banned from prime-time television. It's all activities that involve getting naked (or mostly naked), getting each other off, and sharing incredibly vulnerable moments together.

The only difference between what you're doing and "actual sex" is about four inches of penetration. That's it. That's the line you're drawing in the sand while everything else is fair game.

And look, I get it. Virginity has this weird cultural weight attached to it. For some people, it's religious. For others, it's this symbolic thing they've built up in their heads. But let's be honest about what's happening here.

The Real Question: What Are You Actually Protecting?

You mentioned something crucial in your question: "I guess I just don't really trust anyone enough to go 'all the way' with them."

DING DING DING. There it is.

This isn't about morality. This isn't about religious values. This isn't about waiting for marriage or being virtuous or any of that stuff you're telling yourself.

You're scared.

You're scared that if you have actual intercourse, that's when they'll leave. That's when you'll be too vulnerable. That's when you've given them "everything" and they might walk away.

And here's the uncomfortable truth: maybe you're right. Maybe some of them would leave. But honey, if that's the case, they're going to leave whether you have sex or not. A guy who's going to ghost you after penetrative sex is the same guy who's going to ghost you after you've had his dick in your mouth three times.

The Hypocrisy Breakdown

Let me paint you a picture of what this looks like from the outside:

What you're doing:

  • Masturbating regularly (alone and with partners)
  • Allowing/engaging in manual stimulation to orgasm
  • Oral sex (giving and/or receiving)
  • Every intimate act except penetration
  • Getting emotionally and physically vulnerable with partners

What you're claiming:

  • You're "abstaining from sex"
  • You're "waiting for marriage"
  • You're maintaining some kind of moral high ground

Do you see the disconnect?

It's like saying you're a vegetarian but you eat chicken, fish, and pork—you just don't eat beef. At some point, words have to mean something.

Why This Bothers Me (And Should Bother You)

I'm not judging you for having boundaries. I'm not judging you for being scared of intimacy. I'm not even judging you for the specific sex acts you're choosing to engage in.

What bothers me is the dishonesty.

Not dishonesty with your partners (though there might be some of that too), but dishonesty with yourself.

You asked if you're a hypocrite because deep down, you already know the answer. If you have to ask, then you are. Your gut is telling you something doesn't add up here.

The Religious Loophole

Now, I don't know if religion plays a role in your decision, but let's talk about it anyway because it's relevant.

Most religions that preach abstinence until marriage aren't just talking about penetrative sex. They're talking about all sexual activity. The spirit of the teaching is about reserving intimate physical connection for your spouse.

So if you're trying to stay in God's good graces by avoiding penetration while doing literally everything else, I have news for you: most religious frameworks would consider what you're doing to be just as much of a "sin" as going all the way.

You don't get partial credit for sexual purity. There's no scoring system where oral sex is worth 7 sin points but intercourse is worth 10, so if you stay under 10 you're good.

Either you're abstaining from sexual activity, or you're not. And babe, you're not.

The Trust Issue Nobody Wants to Address

Let's circle back to the real issue: trust.

You said you don't trust anyone enough to "go all the way." But here's my question: Why do you trust them enough to do everything else?

What magical trust barrier exists between "you can finger me to orgasm" and "you can have sex with me"?

Read this hot story:
The Anatomy of Desire: Navigating the Conundrum of the Cock Ring

If someone's going to betray your trust, violate your boundaries, or leave you after getting what they want, they can do that at any level of intimacy. A guy who would pressure you for sex after you've drawn that boundary is the same guy who would pressure you for oral when you said you weren't ready for that either.

The penetration line is arbitrary. You're protecting something that's already been given away: your intimacy, your vulnerability, your body, your pleasure.

What You're Really Afraid Of

I think—and tell me if I'm wrong—that you've built up "losing your virginity" into this monumental, irreversible act that changes everything. Once that barrier is crossed, there's no going back.

And you're right. You can't un-have intercourse once you've done it.

But here's the thing you need to understand: you've already crossed most of the emotional and physical intimacy barriers. That horse has left the barn. The cat is out of the bag. Pick your metaphor.

The idea that you're somehow "saving yourself" while chronically masturbating and engaging in mutual sexual activity is... well, it's the hypocrisy we started with.

The Honest Alternative

Look, I'm not here to tell you that you must have penetrative sex. Your body, your rules. But I am here to tell you to be honest about why you're making the choices you're making.

If you're scared of intimacy: Own it. Say "I'm not ready for that level of vulnerability yet, and I need more time." That's valid.

If you have trust issues: Own that too. Say "I've been hurt before and I need to feel safer before I take that step." Also valid.

If you're using religious/moral justification: Be consistent. Either abstain from ALL sexual activity, or acknowledge that you've already crossed that line and stop pretending otherwise.

If you're worried about abandonment: Recognize that the right person won't leave after sex, and the wrong person will find a reason to leave regardless.

The Uncomfortable Questions You Need to Ask Yourself

  1. Am I being honest with myself about why I have this boundary?
  2. Am I being honest with my partners about my reasons?
  3. If I met someone who said they were "abstaining from sex" but then engaged in all the activities I'm engaging in, would I think they were being genuine?
  4. What exactly am I protecting by not having penetrative sex when I'm already engaging in everything else?
  5. Am I using this boundary as a control mechanism because I'm afraid of being vulnerable?
  6. Would I be okay with this arrangement if the roles were reversed—if someone told me I could get them off but they wouldn't have sex with me?

My Actual Advice

Here's what I think you should do:

Option 1: Commit to Actual Abstinence

If you genuinely believe in waiting until marriage (or until you're in a committed relationship, or whatever your actual value is), then abstain from ALL sexual activity. That means no mutual masturbation, no oral, no hand jobs, no fingering. Nothing.

Be consistent with your values.

Option 2: Drop the Pretense

Acknowledge that you're already sexually active and stop pretending you're "saving yourself" in any meaningful way. Then work on addressing your actual fears around penetrative sex—whether that's fear of abandonment, fear of intimacy, trust issues, or something else.

Get therapy if needed. Have honest conversations with partners about what you're ready for and what you're not.

Option 3: Reframe Your Boundaries

Maybe your boundary isn't really about "waiting for marriage." Maybe it's about "waiting until I'm in a secure, committed relationship where I feel emotionally safe."

That's actually a pretty reasonable boundary! But call it what it is. Don't hide behind moral posturing when what you're really seeking is emotional security.

The Bottom Line

You're not a terrible person. You're not broken. You're just someone who's trying to navigate complex feelings about sex, trust, intimacy, and vulnerability—and you're doing it in a way that's a bit inconsistent.

The hypocrisy isn't the end of the world. But the dishonesty—especially the dishonesty with yourself—is going to keep you stuck in this pattern.

At some point, you need to either put your money where your mouth is (pun absolutely intended) with full abstinence, or acknowledge that you've already crossed into sexual territory and work on the real issues that are keeping you from taking that final step.

Because right now, you're standing at 101 meters from the person you have a restraining order against, technically following the rules but absolutely violating the spirit of them.

And honey, that's exhausting. For you, for your partners, for everyone involved.

One More Thing

Here's the truth bomb you might not want to hear: If you're already doing everything else, having penetrative sex isn't going to dramatically change your relationship dynamics.

The intimacy is already there. The vulnerability is already present. The potential for heartbreak already exists.

That final physical act? It's not going to be the thing that makes or breaks your relationship. What makes or breaks relationships is honesty, communication, emotional availability, and mutual respect.

So maybe, just maybe, it's time to stop giving so much power to one specific sex act and start focusing on building the emotional foundation that makes all intimacy—including penetrative sex—feel safe and right.

The Real Question

The question isn't "Am I a hypocrite?"

The question is: "What am I really afraid of, and how do I address it honestly?"

Answer that, and the hypocrisy question resolves itself.


Stay honest. Stay safe. And for the love of all that's holy, stop lying to yourself about what you're doing.

What's your take? Drop a comment and let's discuss this mess.